MaintainerPulse

temporal prediction of dependency maintenance risk

pytest-extra-durations gabrieldemarmiesse/pytest-extra-durations ▲ high risk

100%
no release in the next 12 months
57%
new issues will go unanswered (30 days)
100%
maintainer activity collapse within 12 months
13%
chance of a release within 12 months (survival model)

Model risk over time

calibrated P(no release next 12mo) at each historical monthly snapshot
0%50%100%2020-112022-052023-122025-06high risk

Repository activity, last 36 months

pushes issues PyPI release
00.512023-112023-12

What drives this score

TreeSHAP contributions; raises risk / lowers risk
days since last release+releases, last 12mo+releases, all time+months since last push+

Survival curve

P(still no release) m months ahead, discrete-time hazard model
0%50%100%036912

What if? — poke the model

drag a signal and the deployed models rescore this package live (implied signals move together — two years without a release also zeroes "releases, last 12mo"). The needle tracks the activity-collapse model, a logistic regression: monotone by construction, so it responds smoothly to counterfactuals where the tree models step.

maintainer activity collapse, 12mo

In plain words

Maintained alternatives

similar packages with low predicted risk; ranked by summary similarity blended with shared-dependents overlap, validated against known migrations
packagewhat it issimilarity shared dependentsits 12mo risk
pytest pytest: simple powerful testing with Python 0.50 1 2%
optree Optimized PyTree Utilities. 0.48 0 17%
pytest-cov Pytest plugin for measuring coverage. 0.47 1 11%
pytest-run-parallel A simple pytest plugin to run tests concurrently 0.47 0 5%
fastf1 Python package for accessing and analyzing Formula 1 results, schedules, timing data and t 0.45 0 4%

Signals at the latest snapshot

days since last release 2324 releases, last 12mo 0
people pushing, last 12mo 0 bus factor (top pusher share) -
issues opened, last 12mo 0 30-day response rate no issues
stars accumulated 6 open vulns without fix 0

Probabilities are isotonic-calibrated on a held-out validation year and evaluated on future snapshots the models never saw (PR-AUC 0.894, precision@50 = 1.00 on the headline target).