MaintainerPulse

temporal prediction of dependency maintenance risk

array-record google/array_record ● elevated

52%
no release in the next 12 months
70%
new issues will go unanswered (30 days)
38%
maintainer activity collapse within 12 months
55%
chance of a release within 12 months (survival model)

Model risk over time

calibrated P(no release next 12mo) at each historical monthly snapshot
0%50%100%2023-012023-112024-082025-06high risk

Repository activity, last 36 months

pushes issues PyPI release
025502023-092024-092025-092026-09

What drives this score

TreeSHAP contributions; raises risk / lowers risk
events, all time+months since last push-new stars, 3mo+repo age (months)+

Survival curve

P(still no release) m months ahead, discrete-time hazard model
0%50%100%036912

What if? — poke the model

drag a signal and the deployed models rescore this package live (implied signals move together — two years without a release also zeroes "releases, last 12mo"). The needle tracks the activity-collapse model, a logistic regression: monotone by construction, so it responds smoothly to counterfactuals where the tree models step.

maintainer activity collapse, 12mo

Maintained alternatives

similar packages with low predicted risk; ranked by summary similarity blended with shared-dependents overlap, validated against known migrations
packagewhat it issimilarity shared dependentsits 12mo risk
aiofile Asynchronous file operations. 0.63 0 38%
fast-array-utils Fast array utilities with minimal dependencies. 0.59 0 17%
fastavro Fast read/write of AVRO files 0.55 0 29%
fsspec File-system specification 0.54 0 6%
numcodecs A Python package providing buffer compression and transformation codecs for use in data st 0.54 0 6%

Signals at the latest snapshot

days since last release 292 releases, last 12mo 2
people pushing, last 12mo 0 bus factor (top pusher share) -
issues opened, last 12mo 1 30-day response rate 0%
stars accumulated 107 open vulns without fix 0

Probabilities are isotonic-calibrated on a held-out validation year and evaluated on future snapshots the models never saw (PR-AUC 0.894, precision@50 = 1.00 on the headline target).